Neck Solutions

August 18, 2008

Neck injury during whiplash increased with head turned postures

Filed under: Neck Pain, Whiplash, Posture — Administrator @ 3:51 pm

Head-turned postures increase the risk of cervical facet capsule injury during whiplash

From: Spine. 2008 Jul 1;33(15):1643-9

Injury to the cervical facet capsular ligaments is a potential mechanism for chronic neck pain after acute whiplash injury. Distending the facet capsule by injecting contrast media has produced whiplash like pain patterns in normal individuals, and anesthetic blocks have isolated the cervical facet joints as the source of pain in about half of a chronic whiplash population. More recently, in vivo animal models of facet capsule loading have shown that group III and IV afferents (thought to mediate pain) from the facet capsule have a graded electrical response to mechanical loading of the facet joint in the goat and have suggested that a capsular ligament strain threshold exists above which allodynia pain in response to a normally nonnoxious stimulus is produced. These data support a facet capsule based mechanism for whiplash injury, but do not establish whether human capsular ligaments are injured in the low speed rear end collisions to which many whiplash injuries are attributed.

Whiplash patients who had their head turned at impact have more severe and persistent symptoms than patients who were facing forward. These findings have prompted biomechanical studies using human cadaveric necks to investigate why a head turned posture increases injury potential. Dynamic rear impact tests of prerotated ligamentous spines (occiput-T1) produce increased neck flexibility (interpreted as injury) in extension, lateral bending and axial rotation. Though concentrated in the lower cervical spine, these injuries were not isolated to particular spinal ligaments. Detailed measurements of the strain field in the facet capsule have also shown that a head-turned posture generates higher capsular strains than a neutral head posture, but the quasi static loads applied during those tests were limited to pure neck flexion/extension moments and did not include the axial compression or posterior shear present during whiplash loading. Thus the question of how a head turned posture combined with multiaxial whiplash loads affects facet capsular ligament strain has yet to be answered.

(more…)

del.icio.us Digg Facebook Technorati Google Furl Yahoo Netvouz Fleck

August 17, 2008

Sitting with ischial and back supports

Filed under: Back Pain, Posture — Administrator @ 10:31 am

Sitting with adjustable ischial and back supports: biomechanical changes

From: Spine. 2003 Jun 1;28(11):1113-21

Low back pain is acute or chronic pain involving the lumbosacral, buttock, and/or thigh. Discogenic low back pain is aggravated by the sitting position, which is necessary in many occupations and daily activities. About 100 million workdays are lost annually in the United States due to low back pain. Despite improved knowledge and health care resources for spinal pathology, chronic disability resulting from nonspecific low back pain is rising exponentially. Although the causes of discogenic low back pain are multifactorial and complex, sitting postures could increase stresses within the disc and contribute to disc degeneration and pain. Two major occupational risk factors are static muscle load and flexed curvature of the lumbar spine; both are involved in seated work tasks.

During sitting, the head, arm and trunk weight is carried mainly by the ischial tuberosities and surrounding tissues. High pressure at the tuberosities is closely associated with high load to the spine. A significant mechanical spine loading is associated with low back pain resulting from trunk muscle coactivation. Ischial and lower back interface pressure vary with different sitting postures and body positioning. Repositioning of the lumbar support to redistribute the interface pressure and load is essential in preventing low back pain associated with inappropriate sitting in a working environment. Therefore, a device that decreases the sitting pressure and load carried by the ischial tuberosity may decrease forces within the disc and associated degeneration and pain.

Physiologic lumbar lordosis in the standing position ranges from 40° to 60°, with the lordosis occurring mainly at S1-L5 and L4-L5, and with the sacral inclination ranging from 30° to 40°. Compared to standing or lying supine, sitting could cause the pelvis to rotate posteriorly, resulting in decreased sacral inclination and lumbar lordosis and increased forces at the discs. A number of investigators have reported interaction between low back pain and biomechanical changes such as decreased lumbar lordosis, malalignment of lumbar curvature, and narrowing of disc spaces. Williams et al reported that use of a lumbar roll that increased lumbar lordosis reduced low back pain, and the chair backrest also helps increase the lumbar lordosis and decrease intradiscal pressure.

(more…)

del.icio.us Digg Facebook Technorati Google Furl Yahoo Netvouz Fleck

August 9, 2008

Reliability of muscle tests in postural neck pain

Filed under: Neck Pain, Posture — Administrator @ 2:58 pm

Reliability of isometric muscle endurance tests in subjects with postural neck pain

From: J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2008 Jun;31(5):348-54

The purpose of this study was to determine the reliability of 3 isometric muscle endurance tests in subjects with postural neck pain. Twenty-one subjects with chronic postural neck pain performed 3 submaximal muscle tests twice on the first occasion and once at the second session 3 days later. The tests examined isometric neck flexion, neck extension, and scapular muscle endurance. Reliability was excellent for the neck flexor test, moderate for the scapular test, and good for the neck extensor test. The standard error of measure for the tests was 6.4, 10.9, and 25.9 seconds, respectively. The minimum change required to represent real change in muscle endurance was 17.8 seconds for the neck flexor test, 30.1 seconds for the scapular test, and 71.3 seconds for the neck extensor test. This study showed the reliability of 3 cervical spine and shoulder girdle submaximal muscle endurance tests in patients with postural neck pain.

del.icio.us Digg Facebook Technorati Google Furl Yahoo Netvouz Fleck

July 18, 2008

Postural sway and cervical vertigo after whiplash injury

Filed under: Neck Pain, Whiplash, Posture — Administrator @ 9:08 am

Consciously postural sway and cervical vertigo after whiplash injury

From: Spine. 2008 Jul 15;33(16):E539-42.

Cross-sectional study of whiplash injury patients with vertigo and healthy volunteers consciously pretending to have postural sway as in malingering. The aim of this study was to evaluate the postural sway in malingerers by posturography. Malingering is not a problem in the majority of cases with whiplash injury and diagnosis should be made carefully. However, some patients with whiplash injury might exaggerate their symptoms or be malingerers because of the potential gain associated with insurance claims. We designed a diagnostic study to screen putative malingerers.

Subjects were 20 healthy volunteers who were tested under standing condition (normal group), consciously swaying the body under standing condition like malingerers (pseudomalingering group) and 32 patients who complained of neck pain with vertigo or dizziness after whiplash injury with whiplash associated disorders grade I and II . The movement of the center of pressure (COP) was measured using a force platform to quantify postural sway. Static posturography was performed under open and closed eyes. We analyzed (1) total envelop area per unit of time, (2) shifting length per second, (3) sway pattern, and (4) Romberg rate representing total shifting length under eyes-closed/eyes-open.

In open eyes condition, the values of envelop area and length per second were significant higher under pseudomalingering than both of the control and whiplash associated disorders groups. The Romberg rate was 1.30 +/- 0.17, 1.13 +/- 0.19, and 1.83 +/- 0.94 in control, pseudomalingering, and whiplash associated disorders group, respectively, and was less than 1.0 in 45% of pseudomalingering. There were significant differences in the envelop area, length per second, and Romberg rate between pseudomalingering and the other 2 groups.

Results suggest that compared with normal subjects and whiplash associated disorder patients, malingerers are more likely to exhibit a wide envelop area, a long sway length per second, and a low Romberg rate. Malingering must be diagnosed carefully and posturography could be a helpful supplementary tool for differentiating whiplash associated vertigo from malingering.

del.icio.us Digg Facebook Technorati Google Furl Yahoo Netvouz Fleck

July 6, 2008

Slouching and lower back pain

Filed under: Back Pain, Posture — Administrator @ 5:54 am

Effects of slouching and muscle contraction on the strain of the iliolumbar ligament

From: Man Ther. Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages 325-333 (August 2008)

The cause of lower back pain is often attributed to intolerable high intradiscal pressure. Use of the spinal compression model is often referred to for workload standards and is the starting point for spinal buckling instability models for lifting in stooped postures. The precise mechanism producing back sprain is, however, still under discussion. Therefore, we decided to explore a novel approach. In contrast to established biomechanical research we do not relate injury risk to forward trunk inclination, but take the unconstrained erect posture as a starting point.

In a previous study we developed a biomechanical model on sitting with hyperkyphosis while leaning against a high backrest. For verification of the model we measured in vitro stepwise backward tilt of the pelvis combined with forward flexion of the spine. We found that during forward flexion of the L5 vertebra the sacrum moved in the opposite direction (counternutation). During the same test we measured (indirectly) elongation of the iliolumbar ligaments. The increase of strain on the iliolumbar ligament by forward flexion of L5 was similar to that reported earlier.

Because patients suffering from acute lower back pain often present with pain at the site of the iliolumbar ligament we decided to develop a model on sudden slouching. Starting point was the absence or delay of protective muscle force. A higher incidence of lower back pain was found in athletes showing delayed muscle reflex response on a quick force release in trunk flexion, extension and lateral bending. In continuation of our earlier biomechanical model on sitting we decided to model dynamic slouching of the upright trunk. The aim of the present study was to assess failure risk of the iliolumbar ligament by means of explorative calculations and to measure in vitro if such risk could be prevented by back muscles. The following hypothesis was postulated: tension in the iliolumbar ligament increases with forward flexion of L5 and decreases by multifidus and erector spinae muscle contraction.

(more…)

del.icio.us Digg Facebook Technorati Google Furl Yahoo Netvouz Fleck

June 20, 2008

Isometric muscle endurance tests in postural neck pain

Filed under: Neck Pain, Posture — Administrator @ 12:13 pm

Reliability of isometric muscle endurance tests in subjects with postural neck pain

From: J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2008 Jun;31(5):348-54

The purpose of this study was to determine the reliability of 3 isometric muscle endurance tests in subjects with postural neck pain. Twenty-one subjects with chronic postural neck pain performed 3 submaximal muscle tests twice on the first occasion and once at the second session 3 days later. The tests examined isometric neck flexion, neck extension, and scapular muscle endurance. Reliability was excellent for the neck flexor test (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0 93), moderate for the scapular test (ICC = 0.67), and good for the neck extensor test (ICC = 0 88). The standard error of measure for the tests was 6.4, 10.9, and 25.9 seconds, respectively. The minimum change required to represent real change in muscle endurance was 17.8 seconds for the neck flexor test, 30.1 seconds for the scapular test, and 71.3 seconds for the neck extensor test. This study showed the reliability of 3 cervical spine and shoulder girdle submaximal muscle endurance tests in patients with postural neck pain.

del.icio.us Digg Facebook Technorati Google Furl Yahoo Netvouz Fleck

June 12, 2008

Postural control and instability in recurrent low back pain

Filed under: Back Pain, Posture — Administrator @ 4:25 am

Altered postural control in anticipation of postural instability in persons with recurrent low back pain

From: Gait Posture. 2008 Jun 7; [Epub ahead of print]

Insight into the mechanisms of altered postural control in persons with low back pain could lead to better interventions for patients with low back pain. This study investigated (1) whether persons with recurrent low back pain have an altered body inclination, and (2) whether anticipation of postural instability further alters body inclination. Thirty-three young healthy individuals and 56 young persons with recurrent low back pain participated in this study. The upright standing posture was evaluated by means of two piezo-resistive electrogoniometers and a force platform for the conditions as follows: (1) quiet stance with and without vision, and (2) in anticipation of postural instability due to a ballistic arm movement or ankle muscle vibration. No differences in body inclination were observed when visual information was available between the two groups. However, significant more forward inclination was seen in the persons with recurrent low back pain when vision was occluded (+7.4%) and in anticipation of postural instability (+19%) compared to the healthy individuals.

The results suggest that young persons with recurrent low back pain have an altered body inclination that might be caused by anticipation of postural instability. The adopted forward inclined posture may potentially be a factor in the recurrence of low back pain.

del.icio.us Digg Facebook Technorati Google Furl Yahoo Netvouz Fleck

June 11, 2008

Occupational lower back pain and sitting

Filed under: Back Pain, Posture — Administrator @ 5:21 am

Association between sitting and occupational Lower Back Pain

From: European Spine Journal. 2007 February; 16(2): 283–298.

Lower back pain has been identified as one of the most costly disorders among the worldwide working population. Sitting has been associated with risk of developing lower back pain. The purpose of this literature review is to assemble and describe evidence of research on the association between sitting and the presence of lower back pain. The systematic literature review was restricted to those occupations that require sitting for more than half of working time and where workers have physical co-exposure factors such as whole body vibration and/or awkward postures. Twenty-five studies were carefully selected and critically reviewed, and a model was developed to describe the relationships between these factors. Sitting alone was not associated with the risk of developing lower back pain. However, when the co-exposure factors of whole body vibration and awkward postures were added to the analysis, the risk of lower back pain increased fourfold. The occupational group that showed the strongest association with lower back pain was Helicopter Pilots.

For all studied occupations, the odds ratio increased when whole body vibration and/or awkward postures were analyzed as co-exposure factors. whole body vibration while sitting was also independently associated with non-specific lower back pain and sciatica. Vibration dose, as well as vibration magnitude and duration of exposure, were associated with lower back pain in all occupations. Exposure duration was associated with lower back pain to a greater extent than vibration magnitude. However, for the presence of sciatica, this difference was not found. Awkward posture was also independently associated with the presence of lower back pain and/or sciatica. The risk effect of prolonged sitting increased significantly when the factors of whole body vibration and awkward postures were combined. Sitting by itself does not increase the risk of lower back pain. However, sitting for more than half a workday, in combination with whole body vibration and/or awkward postures, does increase the likelihood of having lower back pain and/or sciatica, and it is the combination of those risk factors, which leads to the greatest increase in lower back pain.

Lower back pain is an important public health problem in all industrialized countries. It remains the leading cause of disability in persons younger than 45 years old and comprises approximately 40% of all compensation claims in the United States. More than one-quarter of the working population is affected by lower back pain each year, with a lifetime prevalence of 60–80% and a large percentage of lower back pain claims for long durations (more than 90 workdays lost.

(more…)

del.icio.us Digg Facebook Technorati Google Furl Yahoo Netvouz Fleck

June 4, 2008

Influence of test position on neck muscle fatigue

Filed under: Neck Pain, Posture — Administrator @ 3:27 pm

Influence of test position on neck muscle fatigue in healthy controls

From: Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology. 2008 May 30; [Epub ahead of print]

It has been suggested that increased fatigue of neck muscles could be related to neck pain. However, studies on the matter present contradicting results which could be explained by the different test positions used. The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of test position on muscle fatigue of neck flexor and extensor muscles in healthy controls.

Twenty-five women without neck pain sustained neck flexion and neck extension isometric contractions at 25% and 75% of their maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) in two test positions: sitting and supine lying. Using surface electromyography, the change over time of the median frequency of the power spectrum (MDF slope) of the myoelectric signal of the sternocleidomastoid and splenius capitis muscles was measured and compared between both positions.

At 75% MVC, splenius capitis muscles presented higher fatigue in lying compared to sitting, while sternocleidomastoid demonstrated no difference between positions. No statistically significant effect of test position was found at 25% MVC for both sternocleidomastoid and splenius capitis muscles as they generally did not present myoelectric manifestations of fatigue. These results underline the need to standardise the test position when investigating neck muscle fatigue, especially for neck extensors at high loads.

del.icio.us Digg Facebook Technorati Google Furl Yahoo Netvouz Fleck

June 2, 2008

Longus colli postural function on neck curve

Filed under: Neck Pain, Posture — Administrator @ 3:37 am

Longus colli has a postural function on cervical curvature

From: Surgical and Radiological Anatomy. 1994;16(4):367-71

To determine the postural role of longus colli and dorsal neck muscles, we have studied the relationship between their cross sectional areas related to their force of contraction and the lordosis and the length of the neck. This study was carried out in 36 healthy subjects. Muscle cross-sectional areas were measured by computerized tomography. The index of lordosis and the length of the neck were measured on an X-ray profile. The cross sectional area of longus colli was correlated to the lordosis index whereas all the other parameters were not correlated. The authors conclude that longus colli counteracts the lordosis increment related to the weight of the head and to the contraction of the dorsal neck muscles. Postural functions of longus colli and postcervical muscles are complementary. They form a sleeve which encloses and stabilizes the neck in all positions of the head.

del.icio.us Digg Facebook Technorati Google Furl Yahoo Netvouz Fleck

« Previous PageNext Page »

Powered by WordPress