Neck Solutions Blog

July 23, 2010

Effectiveness of manual therapy for chronic tension-type headache: A pragmatic, randomised, clinical trial

Filed under: Headaches — Administrator @ 2:52 pm

Effectiveness of manual therapy for chronic tension-type headache: A pragmatic, randomised, clinical trial

From: Cephalalgia. 2010 Jul 20. [Epub ahead of print]

The 1-year prevalence of chronic tension-type headache is about 2–5% in the general population. In half of the chronic tension-type headache cases, headache related impairment in work performance is reported. In addition to considerable impact on daily functioning and work participation, chronic tension-type headache is a risk factor for overuse of analgesic medication. Only about 20% of the chronic tension-type headache patients seek medical care for their headache. This low consultation rate may be explained by insufficient information on the effectiveness of treatments or by previous negative health care experiences.

In primary care treatment for patients with chronic tension-type headache is often provided by the general practitioner. The Dutch national general practice guideline for the management of headache describes diagnostic and therapeutic algorithms, consisting mainly of reassurance, lifestyle advice and medication. The effectiveness of this guideline for patients with chronic tension-type headache has not been investigated.

The pathogenesis of chronic tension-type headache remains unclear. Pathophysiological theories considering central and peripheral pain mechanisms are described and have been discussed in the literature. In recent research a correlation between chronic tension-type headache and impairment of the cranio-cervical musculoskeletal function (forward head position, trigger points trapezius muscle, neck mobility) has been demonstrated. In combination with results obtained in previous studies the present data support the hypothesis that improvement of the cranio-cervical musculoskeletal function by a manual therapy intervention (postural correction, mobilisation cervical spine, and training of cervical muscles) may be an important factor to modify central or peripheral pain mechanism in chronic tension-type headache.

(more…)

July 8, 2010

Physical Examination and Self-Reported Pain Outcomes From a Randomized Trial on Chronic Cervicogenic Headache.

Filed under: Headaches,Neck Pain — Administrator @ 1:39 pm

Physical Examination and Self-Reported Pain Outcomes From a Randomized Trial on Chronic Cervicogenic Headache.

From: J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2010 Jun;33(5):338-348.

Objective clinical measures for use as surrogate markers of cervicogenic headache pain have not been established. In this analysis, the authors investigate relationships between objective physical examination measures with self-reported cervicogenic headache outcomes.

This was an exploratory analysis of data generated by attention control physical examination from an open-label randomized clinical trial. Of 80 subjects, 40 were randomized to 8 treatments (spinal manipulative therapy or light massage control) and 8 physical examination over 8 weeks. The remaining subjects received no physical examination. Physical examination included motion palpation of the cervical and upper thoracic regions, active cervical range of motion and associated pain, and algometric pain threshold evaluated over articular pillars.

Self-reported outcomes included cervicogenic headache and neck pain and disability, number of cervicogenic headaches, and related disability days. Associations between physical examination and self-reported outcomes were evaluated using generalized linear models, adjusting for sociodemographic differences and study group.

At baseline, number of cervicogenic headache and disability days were strongly associated with cervical active range of motion. Neck pain and disability were strongly associated with range of motion-elicited pain but not later in the study. After the final treatment, pain thresholds were strongly associated with week 12 neck pain and disability and cervicogenic headache disability and disability days.

Cervical range of motion was most associated with the baseline headache experience. However, 4 weeks after treatment, algometric pain thresholds were most associated. No one physical examination measure remained associated with the self-reported headache outcomes over time.

May 19, 2010

The prevalence of headache may be related with the latitude: a possible role of Vitamin D insufficiency?

Filed under: General Health,Headaches — Administrator @ 2:31 am

The prevalence of headache may be related with the latitude: a possible role of Vitamin D insufficiency?

From: J Headache Pain. 2010 May 13. [Epub ahead of print]

According to recent observations, there is worldwide vitamin D insufficiency in various populations. A number of observations suggest a link between low serum levels of vitamin D and higher incidence of chronic pain. A few case reports have shown a beneficial effect of vitamin D therapy in patients with headache disorders. Serum vitamin D level shows a strong correlation with the latitude. Here, we review the literature to delineate a relation of prevalence rate of headaches with the latitude. The authors noted a significant relation between the prevalence of both tension-type headache and migraine with the latitude. There was a tendency for headache prevalence to increase with increasing latitude. The relation was more obvious for the lifetime prevalence for both migraine and tension-type headache. One year prevalence for migraine was also higher at higher latitude.

There were limited studies on the seasonal variation of headache disorders. However, available data indicate increased frequency of headache attacks in autumn-winter and least attacks in summer. This profile of headache matches with the seasonal variations of serum vitamin D levels. The presence of vitamin D receptor, 1alpha-hydroxylase and vitamin D-binding protein in the hypothalamus further suggest a role of vitamin D deficiency in the generation of head pain.

May 13, 2010

Effect of neck exercises on cervicogenic headache

Filed under: Headaches,Neck Pain — Administrator @ 2:58 am

Effect of neck exercises on cervicogenic headache: a randomized controlled trial.

From: J Rehabil Med. 2010 Apr;42(4):344-9

This study compared the efficacy of three 12-month training programmes on headache and upper extremity pain in patients with chronic neck pain. A total of 180 female office workers, with chronic, non-specific neck pain were randomly assigned to 3 groups. The strength group performed isometric, dynamic and stretching exercises. The endurance group performed dynamic muscle and stretching exercises. The control group performed stretching exercises. Pain was assessed with a visual analogue scale. Each group was divided into 3 subgroups according to headache intensity.

At the 12-month follow-up headache had decreased by 69% in the strength group, 58% in the endurance group and 37% in the control group compared with baseline. Neck pain diminished most in the strength group with the most severe headache. In the dose analysis, one metabolic equivalent per hour of training per week accounted for a 0.6-mm decrease in headache on the visual analogue scale. Upper extremity pain decreased by 58% in the strength group, 70% in the endurance group and 21% in the control group.

All of the training methods decreased headache. However, stretching, which is often recommended for patients, was less effective alone than when combined with muscle endurance and strength training. Care must be taken in recommending the type of neck exercises to be undertaken by patients with severe cervicogenic headache.

(more…)

May 12, 2010

Cervicogenic headache: evidence that the neck is a pain generator

Filed under: Headaches,Neck Pain — Administrator @ 2:45 am

Cervicogenic headache: evidence that the neck is a pain generator.

From: Headache. 2010 Apr;50(4):699-705

This review was developed as part of a debate, and takes the “pro” stance that abnormalities of structures in the neck can be a significant source of headache. The argument for this is developed from a review of the medical literature, and is made in 5 steps. It is clear that the cervical region contains many pain-sensitive structures, and that these are prone to injury. The anatomical and physiological mechanisms are in place to allow referral of pain to the head including frontal head regions and even the orbit in patients with pain originating from many of these neck structures. Clinical studies have shown that pain from cervical spine structures can in fact be referred to the head. Finally, clinical treatment trials involving patients with proven painful disorders of upper cervical zygapophysial joints have shown significant headache relief with treatment directed at cervical pain generators. In conclusion, painful disorders of the neck can give rise to headaches, and the challenge is to identify these patients and treat them successfully.

The con noted: Cervicogenic headache is a well-recognized headache syndrome, distinguishable from other primary and secondary headaches. Although in some cases a cervical lesion may be detected in connection with the headache, many cervicogenic headache patients have no demonstrable lesion. Besides, most of the frequent cervical diseases, such as spondylosis and disc herniations, do not present with headache of the cervicogenic type. This suggests that the neck is not an independent headache generator. Cervicogenic headache may depend in addition on a central predisposition counterpart, leading to the activation of the trigeminovascular system and pain generation.

May 11, 2010

Jaw symptoms and signs and the connection to cranial cervical symptoms and post-traumatic stress during the first year after a whiplash trauma

Filed under: Headaches,Neck Pain,TMJ Pain,Whiplash — Administrator @ 3:10 am

Jaw symptoms and signs and the connection to cranial cervical symptoms and post-traumatic stress during the first year after a whiplash trauma.

From: Disabil Rehabil. 2010 May 8. [Epub ahead of print]

The purpose of this study is to estimate the prevalence of jaw symptoms and signs during the first year after a neck sprain in a car collision. Further, to determine their relationships to the localisation and grade of the initial neck symptoms and signs, headache, post-traumatic stress and crash characteristics.

One hundred and forty-six adult subjects and crash characteristics were prospectively investigated in an in-depth study during 1997-2001. Head, neck, and jaw symptoms and signs were recorded within 5 weeks and after 1 year. Acute post-traumatic stress was estimated with the Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R).

Jaw symptoms were initially reported by three men (5%) and three women (4%), and subsequently developed in eight women (10%) during the following year. Jaw signs were noted initially in 53 subjects (37%) and in 28 subjects (24%) after 1 year, without difference between sexes, and more often after low-speed impacts. Headache in females, cranial cervical symptoms, pronounced neck problems, post-traumatic stress and whiplash associated disorders (WAD) grade II-III after rear-end impacts were related to jaw signs during the acute phase. After 1 year, jaw signs were related to residual neck problems, headache and post-traumatic stress.

Jaw symptoms are seldom reported during the acute phase after a whiplash trauma. Women more often than men develop jaw symptoms during the first year. Jaw symptoms and signs may develop also after low-speed impacts, especially after rear-end collisions. Jaw symptoms and signs should be observed after whiplash trauma, especially in those with headache, pronounced neck problems, cranial neck symptoms and post-traumatic stress.

May 1, 2010

Cervicogenic Headache: A Review Comparison with Migraine, Tension-Type Headache, and Whiplash

Filed under: Headaches,Neck Pain,Whiplash — Administrator @ 4:59 am

Cervicogenic Headache: A Review Comparison with Migraine, Tension-Type Headache, and Whiplash

Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2010 Apr 29. [Epub ahead of print]

Neck pain and cervical muscle tenderness are common and prominent symptoms of primary headache disorders. Less commonly, head pain may actually arise from bony structures or soft tissues of the neck, a condition known as cervicogenic headache. The condition’s pathophysiology and source of pain have been debated, but the pain is likely referred from one or more muscular, neurogenic, osseous, articular, or vascular structures in the neck.

Cervicogenic headache is a well-recognized syndrome. Proposed diagnostic criteria differentiate cervicogenic headache from migraine and tension-type headache in most of the cases. The best differentiating factors include side-locked unilateral pain irradiating from the back and evidence of neck involvement attacks may be precipitated by digital pressure over trigger spots in the cervical/nuchal areas or sustained awkward neck positions. Migrainous traits may be present in some cases. Cervical lesions are not necessarily seen, and most common cervical lesions do not produce cervicogenic headache. Whiplash may occasionally induce headaches. This is suspected when the pain onset and the whiplash trauma are close in time. Whiplash related headaches tend to be short-lasting, admitting mostly a tension-type headache or a cervicogenic headache like phenotype. Neuroimaging abnormalities are not necessarily expected in cervicogenic headache. Whiplash patients must undergo cervical imaging mostly in connection with the trauma, as no abnormalities are pathognomonic in chronic cases.

(more…)

April 16, 2010

Chiropractic claims in the English-speaking world

Filed under: Back Pain,Chiropractic,Headaches,Neck Pain,Whiplash — Administrator @ 2:54 am

Chiropractic claims in the English-speaking world.

From: N Z Med J. 2010 Apr 9;123(1312):36-44

Some chiropractors and their associations claim that chiropractic is effective for conditions that lack sound supporting evidence or scientific rationale. This study therefore sought to determine the frequency of World Wide Web claims of chiropractors and their associations to treat, asthma, headache, migraine, infant colic, colic, ear infection, earache, otitis media, neck pain, whiplash (not supported by sound evidence), and lower back pain (supported by some evidence).

A review of 200 chiropractor websites and 9 chiropractic associations’ World Wide Web claims in Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the United Kingdom, and the United States was conducted between 1 October 2008 and 26 November 2008. The outcome measure was claims (either direct or indirect) regarding the eight reviewed conditions, made in the context of chiropractic treatment.

The authors found evidence that 190 (95%) chiropractor websites made unsubstantiated claims regarding at least one of the conditions. When colic and infant colic data were collapsed into one heading, there was evidence that 76 (38%) chiropractor websites made unsubstantiated claims about all the conditions not supported by sound evidence. Fifty-six (28%) websites and 4 of the 9 (44%) associations made claims about lower back pain, whereas 179 (90%) websites and all 9 associations made unsubstantiated claims about headache, migraine. Unsubstantiated claims were made about asthma, ear infection, earache, otitis media, neck pain.

The majority of chiropractors and their associations in the English-speaking world seem to make therapeutic claims that are not supported by sound evidence, whilst only 28% of chiropractor websites promote lower back pain, which is supported by some evidence. The authors suggest the ubiquity of the unsubstantiated claims constitutes an ethical and public health issue.

(more…)

January 27, 2010

The prevalence of neck pain in migraine

Filed under: Headaches,Neck Pain — Administrator @ 2:38 pm

The Prevalence of Neck Pain in Migraine

From: Headache. 2010 Jan 20. [Epub ahead of print]

To determine the prevalence of neck pain at the time of migraine treatment relative to the prevalence of nausea, a defining associated symptom of migraine. This is a prospective, observational cross-sectional study of 113 migraineurs, ranging in attack frequency from episodic to chronic migraine. Subjects were examined by headache medicine specialists to confirm the diagnosis of migraine and exclude both cervicogenic headache and fibromyalgia. Details of all migraines were recorded over the course of at least 1 month and until 6 qualifying migraines had been treated. For each attack, subjects recorded the presence or absence of nausea as well as the intensity of headache and neck pain (graded as none, mild, moderate, or severe).

Subjects recorded 2411 headache days, 786 of which were migraines. The majority of migraines were treated in the moderate pain stage. Regardless of the intensity of headache pain at time of treatment, neck pain was a more frequent accompaniment of migraine than was nausea. Prevalence of neck pain correlated with chronicity of headache as attacks moved from episodic to chronic daily headache.

In this representative cross-section of migraineurs, neck pain was more commonly associated with migraine than was nausea, a defining characteristic of the disorder. Awareness of neck pain as a common associated feature of migraine may improve diagnostic accuracy and have a beneficial impact on time to treatment.

January 22, 2010

Manipulation or mobilisation for neck pain

Filed under: Chiropractic,Headaches,Neck Pain — Administrator @ 10:50 am

Manipulation or mobilisation for neck pain.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Jan 20;(1):CD004249

Manipulation and mobilisation are often used, either alone or combined with other treatment approaches, to treat neck pain.

To assess if manipulation or mobilisation improves pain, function/disability, patient satisfaction, quality of life, and global perceived effect in adults with acute, subacute and chronic neck pain with or without cervicogenic headache or radicular findings.

(The Cochrane Library 2009, issue 3) and MEDLINE, EMBASE, Manual Alternative and Natural Therapy, CINAHL, and Index to Chiropractic Literature were updated to July 2009. Randomised controlled trials on manipulation or mobilisation. Two review authors independently selected studies, abstracted data, and assessed risk of bias. Pooled relative risk and standardised mean differences (SMD) were calculated.

The authors included 27 trials (1522 participants). Cervical Manipulation for subacute and chronic neck pain : Moderate quality evidence suggested manipulation and mobilisation produced similar effects on pain, function and patient satisfaction at intermediate term follow-up. Low quality evidence showed manipulation alone compared to a control may provide short term relief following one to four sessions and that nine or 12 sessions were superior to three for pain and disability in cervicogenic headache.

Optimal technique and dose need to be determined. Thoracic Manipulation for acute/chronic neck pain : Low quality evidence supported thoracic manipulation as an additional therapy for pain reduction (NNT 7; 46.6% treatment advantage) and increased function (NNT 5; 40.6% treatment advantage) in acute pain and favoured a single session of thoracic manipulation for immediate pain reduction compared to placebo for chronic neck pain (NNT 5, 29% treatment advantage).

Mobilisation for subacute/chronic neck pain: In addition to the evidence noted above, low quality evidence for subacute and chronic neck pain indicated that 1) a combination of Maitland mobilisation techniques was similar to acupuncture for immediate pain relief and increased function; 2) there was no difference between mobilisation and acupuncture as additional treatments for immediate pain relief and improved function; and 3) neural dynamic mobilisations may produce clinically important reduction of pain immediately post-treatment. Certain mobilisation techniques were superior.

Cervical manipulation and mobilisation produced similar changes. Either may provide immediate or short term change; no long-term data are available. Thoracic manipulation may improve pain and function. Optimal techniques and dose are unresolved. Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.

Older Posts »

Powered by WordPress