From: BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010 Jul 13;11(1):158.
Whiplash was defined in 1995 by the Quebec Task Force as a neck injury mechanism and may result in injuries within the musculoskeletal and /or neurological system. The Quebec Task Force developed a system for grading Whiplash Associated Disorders : whiplash associated disorders I-II (symptoms without known pathology), III (symptoms and neurological signs), and IV (symptoms and cervical fracture and/or dislocation).
Grade I and II patients represent up to 90 % of “whiplash injury claims”. The proportion of patients who reports pain and disability six months after the accident (i.e. chronic whiplash associated disorders) varies substantially between studies and countries. However, a recent review suggests that approximately 50% of the patients with whiplash associated disorders will report neck pain symptoms one year after their injuries. Patients with chronic whiplash associated disorders report high levels of neck pain, headache, and shoulder pain often accompanied by neck stiffness, dizziness, fatigue, sleeping problems, concentration problems, allergy, breathing disorders, hypertension, cardiovascular disorders, digestive disorders, depression, anxiety, and impairment in cognitive performance. A recent study of a large population-based cohort of victims of car accidents, found that isolated neck pain was rare and that pain from multiple body areas was most commonly reported.
Expectations and coping styles might influence the outcome and prognosis after whiplash injuries. The Cognitive Activation Theory of Stress describes stress response as a general normal, healthy, and necessary alarm. There may be a risk of illness and disease only if the arousal is sustained. The level and duration of the alarm depends on the expectancy of the outcome of stimuli, as well as the results from specific responses available for handling the situation. Therefore, the cognitive activation theory of stress model emphasizes the importance of coping as positive response outcome expectancies. This means that if the individual expects to be able to handle a situation with a positive result (coping), the activation will be short and do no harm. Kivioja et al. found no evidence that early coping strategies influenced the prognosis after whiplash injuries. Others, however, found that high levels of passive coping strategies are associated with a slower recovery after whiplash injury, and that certain coping strategies for pain, such as catastrophizing, is associated with increased risk of disability, and that the importance of coping strategies seem to increase over time. In general, there is considerable controversy as to the importance of psychological factors for developing chronic whiplash associated disorders.
