November « 2009 « necksolutions.com Blog

November 17, 2009

Whiplash associated injury and imaging

Filed under: Neck Pain, Whiplash — Administrator @ 4:35 pm

Magnetic resonance imaging of ligaments and membranes in the craniocervical junction in whiplash associated injury and in healthy control subjects

From: Acta Radiol. 2009 Nov 16. [Epub ahead of print]

The pathogenesis and imaging findings in whiplash associated injury are poorly understood and remain debatable. The authors assessed the ligaments and membranes in the craniocervical junction with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with whiplash associated injury and to compare them with healthy control subjects. Twenty-eight patients with whiplash associated injury were selected at random from a total number of 180 examined with MRI using 2-mm proton density (PD)-weighted images in three orthogonal planes at 1.5T. The patients were compared with 27 healthy control subjects without neck trauma.

High signal intensity of the alar and transverse ligaments was quite common and was reported at an average of about 50% both among patients and control subjects. The incidence of abnormalities of the tectorial and posterior atlantooccipital membranes was low in both groups. No statistically significant difference between control subjects and patients with whiplash associated injury was revealed for any of the structures assessed. Additional fat suppressed images seemed to reduce the number of reported anomalies. Due to lack of significant differences between patients with whiplash associated injury and healthy control subjects, it is not recommended that MRI with the current technique and classification system be used in the routine workup of patients with whiplash associated injury.

Comments (0)

November 15, 2009

Facet tropism and degeneration

Filed under: Arthritis, Back Pain, Disc Problems — Administrator @ 6:03 am

Relationship of facet tropism with degeneration and stability of functional spinal unit

From: Yonsei Med J. 2009 Oct 31;50(5):624-9

Facet tropism is defined as asymmetry in both the facet joint angles of the lumbar and lumbosacral regions. For many years, the effect of facet tropism on the development of intervertebral disc degeneration has been debated. However, the specific details regarding the effects of facet tropism on the development of degenerative disc disease remains as the subject of debate. Most of the previous facet tropism studies have focused on the relationship between facet tropism and lumbar disc herniation.

The role of facet tropism in the pathogenesis of lumbar degenerative disc disease is not fully understood Currently, controversy exists surrounding the question of whether or not any significant relationship exists between facet tropism and the development of disc or facet joint degeneration. Additionally, the relationship between facet tropism and degenerative spondylolisthesis and translational segmental motion is highly controversial.

In the current study, the authors attempted to evaluate the effect of facet tropism on disc and facet joint degeneration. Additionally, the relationship between facet tropism and changes in translational segmental motion was investigated.

Facet tropism is defined as asymmetry between the left and right facet joint angles of the lumbar spine. Asymmetry in the orientation of the zygapophyseal joint surfaces is not uncommon, with estimates of its occurrence at 10-70.5% of the population. Our study revealed an incidence of facet tropism in 35% of the spinal units which were taken into consideration. Facet tropism is most common at L5-S1, followed by L4-L5.

(more…)

Comments (0)

November 11, 2009

Development and evaluation of neck pain and functional limitation scale

Filed under: Neck Pain — Administrator @ 2:28 pm

Development and evaluation of neck pain and functional limitation scale: A validation study in the Asian context.

From: Indian J Med Sci. 2009 Oct;63(10):445-54

Neck pain is one of the most common problems in the population, which affects approximately 67% of individuals at some point of time in their lifetime. Regarding the 12-month prevalence of neck pain, previous research studies have reported it to range between 30% and 50%. Although it is not life threatening, it can cause a sense of being unwell and substantial level of disability due to pain and neck stiffness. This disability can affect the physical functioning of the patients, leading to sickness behavior and activity restrictions. In the general population, the 12-month prevalence of activity-limiting pain has been reported to vary from 1.7% to 11.5%.

The severity of neck pain and the related disability can affect daily social and functional activities, which may even involve emotional and psychological aspects. Thanks to the approval of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) by the World Health Assembly in 2001, neck pain and related consequences could be clearly understood and evaluated by a universal conceptual model termed as biopsychosocial health, which integrated the biomedical and societal models of functioning and disability. Hence, the outcome measures for any disease that predict the disease progress and response should carefully consider the biopsychosocial model involved in the evaluation of the disease process.

A few disease-specific outcome measurement tools that are available for assessing neck pain include neck disability index, neck pain and disability scale, Copenhagen neck functional disability scale, Northwick Park pain questionnaire, patient-specific functional scale self-reports with neck dysfunctions and the North American Spine Society cervical spine outcome assessment instrument. Interestingly, all the above-mentioned tools were developed considering the psychosocial aspects of western culture and were validated in the western context. These tools may have cultural bias and may be unsuitable for use in the Asian context because of the differences in the local cultural practices. Hence there was a need to develop a disease-specific outcome measurement tool for neck pain that reflects the local cultural practice. Thus, the neck pain and functional limitation scale was designed as a new outcome measurement tool to evaluate neck pain.

(more…)

Comments (0)

November 9, 2009

Pain thresholds, catastrophizing and gender in acute whiplash injury

Filed under: Neck Pain, Whiplash — Administrator @ 3:57 am

Relationships between pain thresholds, catastrophizing and gender in acute whiplash injury

From: Man Ther. 2009 Nov 4

The mechanisms underlying sensory hypersensitivity in acute whiplash associated disorders are not well understood. We examined the extent of the relationships between the sensory measures of pressure pain threshold and cold pain threshold, catastrophizing, pain and disability levels and gender in acute whiplash associated disorders. Thirty-seven subjects reporting neck pain following a motor vehicle accident were examined within five weeks post-injury. Measures of neck pain and disability (Neck Disability Index and catastrophizing (Pain Catastrophizing Scale) were taken. Cold pain threshold was assessed in the cervical spine and pressure pain thresholds were assessed in the cervical spine (pressure pain threshold cx) and at a remote site (pressure pain threshold distal). Cold pain threshold and Pain Catastrophizing Scale were moderately correlated; however there were no significant relationships between pressure pain threshold (cervical and distal) and Pain Catastrophizing Scale. Both cold pain threshold and pressure pain threshold cx were significantly correlated with Neck Disability Index but pressure pain threshold distal was not. Finally, gender modulated the relationships between sensory measures, catastrophizing, and pain and disability levels. In conclusion, subjects with higher levels of catastrophizing presented with sensory hypersensitivity to cold stimuli in the acute phase of whiplash. Differences between genders are in accordance with the growing body of evidence suggesting that the relationships between some psychological factors and injury related symptoms are modulated by gender.

Comments (0)

November 4, 2009

Rear impact neck protection devices for adult wheelchair users

Filed under: Neck Pain, Whiplash — Administrator @ 2:56 pm

Rear impact neck protection devices for adult wheelchair users

From: J Rehabil Res Dev. 2009;46(4):499-514

For conventional motor vehicle seats, a head restrainteffectively reduces whiplash injuries to the neck in rear impact collisions, because it substantially reduces relative motion between the occupant’s head and chest. For wheelchair occupants traveling in adapted vehicles, a risk of whiplash injuries also exists, either for forward facing wheelchairs in a rear impact collision or for rearward facing wheelchairs in a frontal collision. However, unlike for motor vehicle seats, the provision of wheelchair head restraints is unregulated and testing of wheelchair head restraints in the mid-1990s indicated that commercial products failed in static tests through plastic bending of the vertical adjuster or pullout forces on the attachment bracket. Recent sled testing of head restraints for child wheelchair users showed that their presence significantly reduced a head restraint head fracture, concussion, and serious neck injury risk for rear impacts. However, how these findingsapply to AIS1 neck injury risk for adults in lower velocity rear impact whiplash cases is unclear. To address this problem, the authors performed a series of nine adult wheelchair occupant rear impact sled tests, where the BioRID-II was seated in a surrogate wheelchair. Tests were performed with and without a head restraint, and a new prototype and anexisting commercial head restraint were used.

Many wheelchair users remain in their wheelchairs during transit. Safety research for wheelchair users has focused mainly on frontal impact. However, although they are generally less severe, rear impact injuries are expensive and difficult to treat and whiplash injury protection for adult wheelchair users remains poorly understood. In this article, rear impact sled tests conducted with the Biofidelic Rear Impact Dummy II or BioRID-II seated in a rigid wheelchair with no head restraint showed that Abbreviated Injury Scale-score 1 neck injury risk evaluated with the neck injury criterion (NIC) and Nkm criterion is substantially above proposed threshold levels. A prototype wheelchair head restraint was developed and tested together with an existing commercial head restraint in the same rear impact. Both head restraints reduced the injury scores substantially. NIC test scores for the head restraints with no gap ranged from 18 to 24 (approximately 20%-30% chance of neck injury symptoms of duration >1 month) compared with test scores for no head restraints that ranged from 34 to 37 (approximately 95% chance of neck injury). The corresponding extension-posterior Nkm scores with no gap ranged from 0.30 to 0.35 (approximately 5% chance of neck injury) compared with no head restraint of 1.16 (approximately 45% chance of neck injury symptoms). However, the number of sled tests performed was small (three with no head restraint and six with a head restraint), and these results should be considered mainly trends. Preliminary results also showed that the horizontal gap between the head and the wheelchair head restraint cushion should be as small possible.

Comments (0)

November 2, 2009

Arm, neck, and shoulder complaints in general practice

Filed under: Neck Pain, Shoulder Pain — Administrator @ 12:39 pm

Management decisions in nontraumatic complaints of arm, neck, and shoulder in general practice

From: Ann Fam Med. 2009 Sep-Oct;7(5):446-54

Complaints of arm, neck, and shoulder pain are very common in Western societies. In the Netherlands the estimated 12-month prevalence in the general population was 31% for neck pain, 30% for shoulder pain, 11% for elbow pain, and 18% for wrist or hand pain. Studies have reported that of the respondents with noninflammatory musculoskeletal pain, about 30% to 45% contacted their general practitioner. In Dutch general practice, incidence data for patients with nontraumatic arm, neck, or shoulder complaints show 97 consultations per 1,000 registered persons annually.

Common management options for patients with nontraumatic arm, neck, and shoulder complaints are watchful waiting, additional diagnostic tests, prescription of medication, referral for physiotherapy, a corticosteroid injection, and referral for medical specialist care. Use of these 6 management options shows wide variation, however, both between and within diagnostic groups. Until now, no studies have evaluated the determinants that contribute to variation in the management of these complaints. Part of this variation may be explained by the diagnosis, which, because of its natural course and available treatment, usually guides management. Also, patient and complaint characteristics may influence management. In the Netherlands guidelines issued by the Dutch College of General Practitioners are available for epicondylitis and shoulder complaints; in both guidelines, management advice is partly based on differences in the levels of hindrance (pain severity and functional limitations). In other study populations, patient and complaint characteristics reported to be associated with management options are distress, poor perceived health, age, and sex. Additionally, indicators of poor prognosis can play a role in management decisions. In our earlier study in this population, indicators of poor prognosis were long duration of the complaints at baseline, having musculoskeletal comorbidity, recurrent complaint, low social support, and a high somatization level.

The authors wanted to evaluate associations between diagnosis and characteristics of the patient, complaint, and general practitioner, as well as 6 common management decisions, in patients with nontraumatic arm, neck, and shoulder complaints at the time of the first consultation with their physician. They undertook an observational cohort study set in 21 Dutch general practices, including 682 patients with nontraumatic complaints of arm, neck, and shoulder. The outcome measure was application (yes/no) of a specific management option: watchful waiting, additional diagnostic tests, prescription of medication, corticosteroid injection, referral for physiotherapy, and referral for medical specialist care. Separate multilevel analyses showed that overall, the diagnostic category, having long duration of complaints, and reporting many functional limitations were most frequently associated with the choice of a management option. For watchful waiting, only complaint variables played a role (long duration of complaints, high complaint severity, many functional limitations, recurrent complaint). All these variables were negatively associated with watchful waiting. When opting for 1 of the 5 other management options, several physician characteristics played a role as well. Less clinical experience was associated with additional diagnostic tests and referral to a medical specialist. General practitioners working in a solo practice more frequently referred to a medical specialist. General practitioners working in a rural area more frequently referred for physiotherapy. Female General practitioners prescribed medication less frequently. Physicians with special interest in musculoskeletal complaints gave corticosteroid injections more frequently.

Diagnostic category, long duration of complaints, and high functional limitations were key variables in management decisions with arm, neck, and shoulder complaints complaints. In addition, several physician characteristics played a role as well.

Comments (0)